NBK wrote:Interesting take on the issue.
I wonder how Kano chose the schools he did stick with. There's a bit of evidence that he studied other schools, and didn't progress. The death of one of his teachers and the presentation of the traditional scrolls and the responsibility for the 'school' by his deceased instructor's wife must have had a great impact on the young Kano - if that had not happened, perhaps judo would be very different today if he had wandered off to practice yet another art such as Takeuchi ryu or Sekiguchi ryu. Would judo be much more of a combative art? Frontal pulldowns and rear mounts for control, as we still practice in Takeuchi ryu? Sekiguchi ryu jujutsu is just about gone, but as a Takeuchi ryu offshoot, there are a lot of similarities.
I have a reference to an exhibition circa early 1890s and Kano shihan performing randori, and acting as uke in a number of kata. Not much after that.
NBK
Yes ... indeed. Kôdôkan generally keeps silent of Kanô's participation in other schools or represent it as something really positive as "how he studied all these things and finally selected the best". One could write it more neutral like you do: "There's a bit of evidence that he studied other schools, and didn't progress." (...) Or one could go also a step further and write: "he was unable to progress and dropped out".
The comparison with Ueshiba is always interesting; they studied some of the same schools, but whereas Ueshiba is seen to actually qualify, Kanô turns out to "not progress" to say things in a polite way ...
Their exploits in Tenjin Shin'yô-ryû and Kitô-ryû are pretty well known, although not their extent. So far not a single document is available that shows that Kanô ever qualified in TSYR, meaning ... not a rolled up scroll, that anyone can claim to be his qualifications, but an actual page with his name on and that of the issuing teacher that shows that a specific qualification in this school was given to him, or even just the scroll as not all schools gave actual kirigami that showed a specific qualification.
Kanô once more "didn't make it" (= failed) Yagyû shingan-ryû, in which Ueshiba again --though not the top qualifiation-- at least obtained shodan. The Kôdôkan remains remarkably silent about Kanô's membership as a student of YSR.
You may be surprised to hear that Kanô also had a go in Katori shintô-ryû, another and quick failure ...
Can you imagine --and I mean seriously-- someone being a martial arts master in a school, when the only "defensive techniques" the person learnt is Koshiki-no-kata ? Would you send anyone to a battle field with only that experience behind his belt ? Sure, Kitô-ryû once in the days of Chûsingura was a feared and glorious sôgô budô school with all kinds of sub-disciplines including use of the jinkama, iaijutsu, bôjutsu, ô-dachi, etc. But by the time Kanô started and in his branch with Iikubo, nope, this was all already gone from the curriculum. So, that's it, that is the basis on which Kanô became "a master of jûjutsu" and as a 23-year old kid in October Meiji 16 got his certificate: the 21 techniques of Koshiki-no-kata, nothing else (apart from ukemi). There is no evidence of Kanô ever having qualified in anything else martial arts but then, and as a kid. Can you imagine someone being 23 years old introducing him to you as a master of judo with the only thing he qualified in is nage-no-kata ?
Apart from whether one believes the ki-stuff regarding Ueshiba, the man is seen moving, and seriously moving using tai-sabaki with uke until old age. Even if you argue that his uke are just being respectful, just like Mifune he will be breaking sweat, and his heart rate and ventilation will be going up. Nothing like that with Kanô who carefully steered free of any of that, and left not material to judge his actual combative judo skills, only a limited aesthetic display.
Moreover, as you know Ueshiba's major skills were in Daitô-ryû in which he obviously qualified too, and I don't think that this was limited to merely intellectual work and polite kata displays at all. I am not suggesting that Kanô had zero skils, the short clip that has survived with him showing uki-goshi shows the man knows what tai-sabaki is, debana, and kuzushi, no doubt, and his cultural-intellectual study was quite serious. And of course koshiki-no-kata wasn't practised as a static display as it is today but almost as randori. I am only saying is that he wasn't some really skilled fierceful master who had a stellar career in other martial arts schools when the Kodokan started, and that he compiled stuff rather than created, and that he imported this information without being actually fully qualified as a master in those schools, and that much of the practical spread of judo outside of polite lectures for notable guests was rather done by his associates than by the man himself. Really, he wasn't that different from many of the soke, dai-shihan that pop up everywhere wearing their red gi and who quickly become 10th dan in their own school. Many of them also evolved to shodan or nidan in karate or judo or goshindo in one or another school. But they are mocked and labeled charlatans, whereas Kanô who wasn't very different apart from that he was accepted in aristocratic circles an obtained some important positions in the Olympic committee, ministry of education and a number of schools. Basically, through his position and connections he got the legitimacy despite a questionable martial arts background whereas others now with such backgrounds would never get that legitimacy because they don't have the network to give credence to their skills as originator of a new school and martial art.
Then again, there are some --not many, but some-- examples of decent music conductors who never learnt how to properly play an instrument yet became decent conductors. I don't think this would work in everyone, but I think it is possible in exceptional cases that someone can become a successful leader in a branch he himself was not particularly successful in. I can imagine that someone might become a decent teacher of law, while not being a particularly good trial lawyer, for example. Therefore, one should not confound Kanô with the art of jûdô itself. I just believe that part of the fighting effectiveness of judo was filled in by people other than Kanô.
You are probably referring to 1894 large demonstration at the occasion of the opening of the new Shimo-Tomisaka Kôdôkan..