by pat parker Fri May 31, 2013 11:53 am
Thanks for the welcome. I agree with you - peer review is important. Without it we all have a tendency to spin off on our own tangents and get flaky. An internet forum is a difficult medium for peer review, though, because emotional content does not transmit well, and its easy to misunderstand intent.
I first learnt junokata from Dr. Chris Dewey at Miss State, who learnt it from (i think) Fukuda sensei and one of the usja kata champs (fernandez maybe?) At seminars. Make no mistake, what they taught me was only remotely similar to what i was working on in those clips.
The explicit purpose of that weekend on those video clips was to introduce a bunch of tomiki aikido folks to this kata that we figured must have had some influence on tomiki sensei's way of thinking, even though there are no surviving films of tomiki working junokata. These tomiki folks had no interest in learning acompetition form kata from a kata nazi - rather, they wanted to hear my ideas of how i thought it might be related to the stuff tomiki was doing.
In fact, when they first asked me to teach junokata, i tried to beg off and give them a list of 3-4 instructors infinitely more qualified than me, but they assured me that they were specifically interested in exploring _my_ ideas wrt the connection btw tomiki and junokata.
As such, it was a fun weekend, well-attended, and i threw out a ton of hints about motion and connection and kuzushi that seemed to be well-received. The little circle discussion at the end regarding what does junokata have to do with randori impressed me and convinced me that my ideas that i'd thrown out had been caught.
Certainly, there were many, many flat out errors in what we did, but it worked pretty good for the stated purpose - and everyone had fun and nobody got hurt, so it was a good day :-)